- The writer says, “The idea of childhood is disappearing”. What is his “idea of childhood”?
Berg’s idea of childhood is when children were able to have fun and not worry about anybody else. He’s idea of childhood is before the printers and media, but after the medieval, and the time of school. He believes that the knowledge of the child represented when one ‘turned into’ an adult.
- Why does he believe the “idea of childhood” did not exist in the medieval world?
Berg belives that the idea of childhood did not exist in the medieval world because of the ‘absence of the idea of education, the absence of the idea of shame’. The access to information was not easily accessible in the medieval world, therefore their only knowledge was from adults, who had no shame.
- What are the elements of the “idea of childhood” the writer seems to be talking about?
The elements of the ‘idea of childhood’ the writer talks about is the loss of children’s innocence. With the introduction of media and technology, children are getting the answers to the questions they had not asked. This suggests that they have access to the same information as adults, therefore it is harder to separate an adult from a child.
- Comment on his use of the term “the idea of childhood”. What would be more accurate?
The writer suggests that there are many ideas and views of childhood from different point of views, and eras. He suggests that childhood is an idea that children are naive and shameless, but this is just ONE idea.
- The writer defines childhood as it became known after the development of printing. However, he sees this definition as having been eroded by the advent of electronic media. What is his argument for this? How well do you believe he justifies his argument?
The writer wrote in his new edition of his book, that much is the same, however it is only getting worse. When he initially wrote the book, it would have been through the idea of the development of printing, which is when the idea of childhood started to disfigure. But now, in the 21st century, the idea of electronic media has increased the erosion of childhood because of the knowledge it allows children to possess.
- The writer comments on the “meshing of adult and child worlds” and concludes that “wherever one looks, one sees more evidence that childhood is disappearing”. What assumption underpins his argument? Comment on the accuracy of his statement.
The writer suggests that children are quickly becoming like adults, that sometimes people cannot tell a child from an adult. He also suggests that children are becoming like this because of the knowledge and idea of ‘growing up’ that they want to have. Children are constantly ‘looking up at adults’, and as a result, are’mimicking’ them, so that their childhood is disappearing. I believe that this is accurate, as more and more, children are growing up too fast, and soon adults and children will have the same knowledge.